A while back, Michelle Rhee had an article published under her name in the Washington Post criticizing parents who opt thir children out of state testing. Her main reason seemed to be that parents won’t know whether he school is doing a good job unless they see standardized test scores.
Matt Di Carlo, no fan of he opt out movement, here takes issue with Rhee. She doesn’t understand the purpose of testing, he writes.
“For example, right at the outset, the article asserts that tests are “designed to measure how well our schools are teaching our children.”
“This is just not accurate. Tests are designed to permit inferences, however imperfect, about how well students know a given block of content (e.g., relative to other students).
“Now, of course, we as a nation also have chosen to use these data to assess schools’ and teachers’ contributions to students’ progress…
View original post 363 more words